Translate

Showing posts with label Harry Potter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Harry Potter. Show all posts

Sunday, May 19, 2019

Welcome to the Emotional End Game

It's been about a month, is it safe for me to write about "Endgame", yet?


Don't worry if you haven't seen the last Avengers movie just yet. I don't plan on going through it point by point or relieving any major spoilers.

I do what to praise the movie for being an excellent book end to the three phase of the MCU (Marvel Cinematic Universe for the few of you who aren't familiar with the acronym). 12 years ago, the MCU launched with "Iron Man" (2007). In 2012 the "Avengers" movie hit the big screen, tying together at least 4 other movies (the 2008 "Incredible Hulk", the 2010 "Iron Man 2", the 2011 "Thor" and the 2011 "Captain America: The First Avenger").

I'm sure historians will look back on the 2010s and find that a lot of our pop culture history will be tied to these movies. Disney has done an excellent job keeping people interested all the way through "Endgame" and making a ton of money to boot.

Though the movies were always hit and miss (I'm specifically thinking of "Thor the Dark World"), even the worst of the MCU movies was decent. There isn't a "rotten" one among them, just mediocre. They've set the standard for super hero movies and intertwining a cinematic universe which others have failed to copy (sorry Universal, no "Dark Universe" for us please).

"Endgame" managed to do what many other great series have failed: giving us a good ending. It's not perfect and I have my nit picks (but I won't go into those here).

How many times have you followed a book, or TV series, or movie series only for the ending to fall flat?

Way too many for me.

There are times where the series takes a left turn half way through and goes in a strange direction, there are times where the story just drags on way too long, and there are times where the writers decide to "jump the shark" and really mess with their fans.

I think "Game of Thrones" fans are currently going through this, but I've seen it happen to a number of stories I've loved. I'm still not over how "The Immortal Diaries of Nickolas Flamel" ended and I haven't gotten myself to watch the latest "Fantastic Beasts" movie. Heck, I didn't even realize that "NCIS" was still making new episodes.

However, every once in a while a writer is able to wrap up a story and give it the best send off possible to the fans. Books like "Harry Potter" (minus the 19 years later scene) and the "Hunger Games" have great endings that totally fit with the story. "Gravity Falls" has a nice little bow topping it's last few episodes, tying everything together in a wonderfully weird way.

Best TV show ending ever!
And "Endgame" was the movie we needed to end the 2010s MCU.

Yes, I'm aware that Disney is going to be making more movies and TV shows. This is a cash cow, so they're going to milk it until the profits run dry. But I don't feel the need to keep up with it any more. My emotional needs for this story has been met.

That's what's important. The audience's emotional needs.

Writing these long epic stories is tough. There are a lot of plots to keep track of and characters who need to have their arcs finished. When a writer or group of writers can pull it off, it's wonderfully satisfying. It's like saying goodbye to a close friend, one you hope to visit again soon.

If you haven't seen "Endgame", yet and you are familiar with the MCU, I recommend it. You'll probably want to binge the other movies before going because there's a lot of background stuff you'll need to know, but the movies are good.

Do you have any series (movies, TV, or books) that you've felt have ended well? Do you have any that you feel dropped the shoe at the worst moment (other than the ones I've already mentioned)? Drop me a comment if you do.

Until next time!

If you enjoyed this post (or it really pissed you off) please like, share, and/or leave a comment. I love hearing from my readers and I hope you guys like hearing from me.

Sunday, September 16, 2018

Welcome to the Witching Hour Part 5: Teen Witch Craze

I recently started watching the Netflix show Worst Witch. It’s about preteen girls learning how to become witches at a magical boarding school. Within the first episode there are magical potions, flying on broom sticks, and a battle between a good witch and a bad witch. So far, I’ve really enjoyed the show.

This isn’t the first incarnation of Worst Witch. Originally a book series, Worst Witch has had a total of four TV iterations (one being a spin off) with the fist being the 1985 TV movie. It’s clear that the story of Mildred Hubble is popular and has resonated with a lot of people.

Worst Witch is just one example of the trope that a young child discovers they have magical powers and must now learn how to control them all while avoiding evil witches and wizards. Harry Potter is another well known example of this trope.

However, it isn’t the only story line out there featuring witches. Tales of sisterhood and coming of age are also popular tropes to show up in Witch related media. At least the witch related media aimed at young women and children tend to have these story lines. Harry Potter is the odd one out as it is generally considered for all people.

That’s not to say that men and boys can’t like women driven story lines, especially of the magical variety. These stories just aren’t targeted to them the same way they are targeted to women. The 1980s, 1990s, and 2000s saw a lot of witch media hit the big and small screen that was almost explicitly for young women.

In 1989, the movie Teen Witch hit theaters. It was trying to capitalize on the genre of teen flicks with a supernatural or paranormal undertone that became popular with the release of Teen Wolf in 1985. The same year that Teen Witch hit theaters, Studio Ghibli released the animated movie Kiki's Delivery Service in Japan. Kiki's Delivery Service also featured a young witch teenage witch (Kiki is 13 in the movie) trying to make her way in the world. The Craft and Sabrina the Teenage Witch both became cultural icons in 1996 and were quickly followed by the movie Practical Magic (1998) and the TV series Charmed (1998 - 2006).

The look so cool and powerful!
Disney Channel took notice of the rising popularity in witches, especially for young girls, to create several made for TV movies including: The Halloweentown series and the Twitches movies.

It would be silly of me to not include the rise in popularity of Harry Potter in the 1990s that has lasted all the way to today. We now have two popular movie franchises, an official play, multiple unofficial plays, and more books than my bookshelf at home can hold. More importantly, we have the characters of Hermione Granger, Ginny Weasley, Mrs. Weasley, and Tonks who were pivotal in shaping the confidence of many young girls looking for literary role models.

Of course we still had the movies and TV shows featuring evil witches. Hocus Pocus (1993) is still one of the most iconic Halloween movies for kids who grew up in the 90s. The Witches of Eastwick (1987) had an all star cast with plenty of nasty shenanigans and still ended with the ladies taking on the big bad guy in a show of sisterhood. Then there’s the 1990 adaptation of Roald Dahl’s book The Witches which gave young me many a nightmare. At least the movie ends a lot happier than the book where the children are stuck as mice instead being turned back into children by a nice witch.

My point is that there has been a lot more media in the past 4 decades featuring witches in a positive light than a negative one. Sure we had the Bewitched series from 1964 to 1972 which I think helped spring board the “good witch” stories we eventually got. However, the horror industry of that era continuously used the “bad witch” trope in their sploitation movies (most of which are hilariously bad).

Now “bad witch” movies aren’t the norm.

Occasionally we’ll see a Blair Witch (1999 and 2016) or The Witch: A New England Folktale (2015), but these types of scary movies are now few and far between. Most Witch media now is fun, happy, and how to be a good witch. Witches are seen as teachers of empowerment instead of a people to be feared.

Is it any wonder that some girls went through a witch phase in middle or high school? Having magical powers isn’t just about solving your problems or getting revenge against the mean girl at school. In fact, the petty, mean, or dangerous spells usually resulted in an important lesson on not misusing magic and the consequences of selfish acts. Magic in these shows is about finding a sense of self empowerment and feeling good about your own abilities. At least that’s what I got out of the books, movies, and TV shows I consumed.

It’s also why I love idea of being a witch.

If you enjoyed this post (or it really pissed you off) please like, share, and/or leave a comment. I love hearing from my readers and I hope y'all like hearing from me.

Until next week!

Sunday, August 19, 2018

Welcome to the Witching Hour Part 2: A Child's Introduction

Was anyone else disappointed by J K Rowling's portrayal of the Harry Potter Universe in America? I know that it's her Universe and she has creative license, but I felt that it lacked a true understanding of American culture and pretty much erased/misappropriated pre-Colombian culture all together (i.e. Native American culture).

Also why is the Wizarding World's American Central Government in New York? Our Capital is Washington D.C.! If you don't want to put it there at least have the Capital in Arlington, Alexandria (which makes the most sense), or at the very least Baltimore. She could have even picked a city that has a lot of ties to Native American history (like saying screw it, Mexican Wizards and American Wizards get along and their capitol is Mexico City). New York just feels super cliche.

I could go on forever about why I have so many feelings regarding J K Rowling's decisions on Wizards in America, but that's not what this post is about.

It's about my introduction to the ideas and power of witches.

Harry Potter was a major influence on my early childhood. I remember my mother reading me the first three books, going to a midnight party for the fourth book's release at Borders Books, and reading the final book in under 72 hours. I dreamed about being able to go to Hogwarts and which house I'd end up in (Hufflepuff). I loved these books (and still do).

Harry Potter wasn't my first introduction to the magic users known as witches and wizards. I had several picture and short chapter books that I had been introduced to before and during the Harry Potter craze.

To be perfectly clear, most of the media I was consuming was definitely based on European ideas of witches and witchcraft. Hardly any of it extended beyond the tropes found in European fairy tales and folklore. So, much like J K Rowling, my understanding of magic and "witches" of other cultures is severely lacking or warped by Hollywood's misappropriation.

Still, it didn't stop me from becoming curious about the witches I was introduced to.

One of the first picture books I remember my mother reading to me about witches was Strega Nona (translated as Grandma Witch or Granny Witch). Strega Nona had a magical cooking pot that could produce as much pasta as she needed, so long as she preformed the spell correctly. One night a young man called Big Anthony tries out Strega Nona's cooking pot, while she's conveniently away, and ends up creating so much pasta that it covers the entire village. When Strega Nona returns, she makes Big Anthony eat all of the pasta he created.

It was a fun and silly picture book.


Other books weren't nearly as silly or light hearted. The Witches by Roald Dahl absolutely terrified me as a child. At that time, I couldn't imagine anyone being that horrible in real life, especially to children . Bony Legs was another book about a scary witch, who had a more than passing resemblance to the Russian folk witch Baba Yaga, who wanted to eat a little girl who had wandered into her house. My grandmother had given me that book and I loved how resourceful and kind the main character Sasha was. It was a good balance of scary and adventure for young me.


Finally there were the Bailey School Kids books which featured stories about magical and mythical beings who shouldn't be real, but quite possibly were. One was Witches Don't Do Back-flips which told the story about a gym teacher who might have also been a witch.

Those are just the books I read. There were also plenty of movies and TV shows such as Charmed, Practical Magic, Kiki's Delivery Service, The Craft, the Halloween Town movies, Sabrina the Teenage Witch, Scooby Doo and the Witches Ghost, and the classic The Wizard of Oz. Each had varying degrees of good witches (who always won in the end) and bad witches.


What did I take away from this? Well as Dumbledore said "It is our choices, Harry, that show what we truly are, far more than our abilities." Witches aren't good or evil by virtue of them being witches. They just have really cool abilities that they can choose to use for good or evil purposes.

This gave me hundreds of hours of possible imaginative scenarios to play out. I loved the idea of being a good witch who could help others solve their problems or getting back at bullies. There were a lot of imaginative quests where I, the good witch, would defeat the evil witch (they usually involved lots of sparklers on the 4th of July).

I never thought of witches as evil by virtue of them being witches.

However, historically, this wasn't the case. Witches were often feared, hated, hunted, and always thought of as evil.

If you enjoyed this post (or it really pissed you off) please like, share, and/or leave a comment. I love hearing from my readers and I hope you guys like hearing from me.

Until next week.

Sunday, May 6, 2018

Welcome to Food World Building Part 4: Food in Fiction

One of my favorite YouTube channels is Feast of Fiction. It's a YouTube channel entirely dedicated to recreating food found in popular books, movies, TV shows, games, and graphic novels. The two leads, Jimmy and Ashley, have created an awesome show that entertains and teaches viewers about food. A lot of times the food they are making doesn't have a known recipe to follow, so they have to create the recipe.

It takes a lot of creativity and guts to come up with recipes that might sound good on paper, but aren't practical to make. For example, it might be a little hard to make acid pops from Harry Potter as they are known for burning holes in people's tongues. I'm also not too keen on the idea of cockroach clusters.

But it's the inclusion of these odd treats along with descriptions of butterbeer, pumpkin pasties, and sugar quills that add to the Harry Potter universe.

Yes, I've actually tried making pumpkin juice. It turned out alright.
I love it when authors weave in small details about food. They make the world feel more alive and believable.

I've always been curious as to what is in lembas bread that keeps away hunger from Lord of the Rings. I'd love to try Tiana's gumbo and beignets from The Princess and the Frog. And which deity do I have to bribe to bring the creations of Food Wars into existence?

Now, food doesn't have to prominently feature in the narrative. There seems to be an entire section of Amazon and Barnes and Nobel dedicated to food themed mysteries (complete with recipes in the back). Like Water for Chocolate has chapters that start out listing ingredients and describing how to make a dish, then slowly transitions into the plot. Food is used to show wealth and prosperity in Charles Dickens's classic A Christmas Carol, especially once the second spirit shows up. And it's occasionally used as an innuendo in steamy romance novels (Like Water for Chocolate can be used euphemism for sexual tension or passion).

The thing about food in fiction is that it's not always just about the food. Descriptions of decadent meals show off wealth and power, especially when poverty is also heavily described (The Hunger Games series is an excellent example of this). Character's who don't often think about when they'll eat next are more likely to be in a stable environment versus a character who is constantly worrying about where they're next meal is coming from. Does a culture hold a certain animal or plant as sacred? If so they might not be including it in their diet or it could be the most central part of a meal.

How do character's react when they're hungry? Are they irritable or can they manage it no problem? Is that character used to hunger? Do they overeat the first chance they're with in grabbing distance of a good meal? These can be important tiny details that help to define a situation in the narrative.

For example, in the seventh Harry Potter book Harry, Ron, and Hermione are on the run with little food and almost no money. They're hungry and each reacts slightly different to the situation. Harry was used to going hungry after being neglected by his Aunt and Uncle for years. He wasn't happy about being hungry, but otherwise wasn't that affected by it. Ron, however, was used to never going hungry and was irritated and angry the second he missed a meal. Despite growing up poor, his family always had enough to go around and he was always well fed at Hogwarts. Hermione was the middle of the two extremes. She wasn't used to going hungry like Harry was and could be irritated by the lack of a good meal, but she wasn't quite to Ron's level of anger.

The situation was made worse by the fact that they had a cursed object with them, adding to they're already short tempers.

So if you're a writer, I'd recommend incorporating some descriptions of food into your work. Don't over do it though. Describing a meal down to the tiny detail of "the cinnamon garnish carefully floating on the frothy cappuccino milk" is going to make me put down the book and head to the nearest coffee shop.

Also I don't recommend the use of food to describe characters, especially skin color for non-white characters. Describing people this way can be seen as objectifying or down right creepy. If you'd like a blog post on how to describe a person's skin tone without using food, check out this blog post. It's a few years old, but I think it's still a good guide for modern writes who'd like to include a diverse cast (which writers should be doing anyway).

What does a basket of apples, peppers, tomatoes, and peaches say about a character?
So, the moral of this food related post is: include descriptions of food, but don't over do it and don't use food to describe a character's looks.

Until next week!

If you enjoyed this post (or it really pissed you off) please like, share, and/or leave a comment. I love hearing from my readers and I hope you guys like hearing from me.

Sunday, January 28, 2018

Welcome to Folklore and Mythology Part 8: Guiding Mentors

What do Obi-Wan Kenobi, Albus Dumbledore, and Merlin have in common?

Hint: it's not just the awesome supernatural powers.

They're all mentors to the young protagonist of their respective stories. Obi-Wan is a mentor to Luke, Dumbledore to Harry Potter, and Merlin to King Arthur (unless it's the BBC TV version in which case BFFs for life!!!). They teach their respective charges important lessons and guide them in their journey to become heroes.

Mentors often represent the older generation in stories. They have the wisdom of a long life and teach the younger generation what they probably should and should not do. Mentors aren't infallible beings either. They are known for making mistakes, mistakes that the hero may have to face and rectify for the mentor.

The mentor is often known to die before the end of these stories.

I often took that trope to show how the older generation (the mentor) will eventually have to make way for the younger generation (hero) to take charge of society (narrative). This trope is seen in Harry Potter, Star Wars, Buffy, and even Lord of the Rings (though Gandalf is eventually resurrected).

Chiron is one of the most famous mythological mentors in Western culture (much like Merlin, but he lives in his story). He was responsible for teaching many of Greece's greatest heroes including, Achilles, Ajax, Jason, Theseus, and, of course, Heracles. It's Heracles who is ultimately responsible for Chiron's death with a poisoned arrow, allowing Heracles to exchange Chiron's life for Prometheus's (versions of this story vary and I'm using Wikipedia as my main source as I can't find my mythology book with this story in it).

Chiron and Achilles

Mentors don't even have to be "good guys" necessarily, though this is a more modern trope. They just have to be guiding force and teacher to the protagonist. In the Anime/Manga Black Cat, the hero, Train, is trained by the man who murdered his parents. The man takes Train in with the explicit purpose of teach Train how to kill him one day. Train eventually grows up to become one of the best assassins in his organization.

Another example of this modern trope would be Littlefinger from Game of Thrones choosing to look after and mentor Sansa Stark. He mentor's Sansa in the art of The Game of Thrones so that she will survive and possibly win. He is without doubt a morally ambiguous character (even by his universe's standards), but that doesn't stop him from trying to teach and guide Sansa in the world she has found herself in. Just don't think too hard about his creepy attraction to her because she looks like her dead mother.

Even villains need mentors.

Darth Vader had Darth Sidious. Sauron had Morgoth. Light had Ryuk. Each teaching and tempting them to the ways of the villain.

Mentors are as important in mythology and folklore as they are in our modern society. Seriously, one of the first pieces of advice I was given when I joined the workforce was to find a good mentor to teach and guide me. Every few months Business Insider usually has one or two articles about how to find good mentors. Even I wrote a blog post about this in the first year of starting this blog (I'm not sure how good it is anymore, but click here if you're curious).

People can have many mentors throughout their life. Mentors can be relatives, family friends, teachers, or complete strangers who live on an island and you have to seek out because someone told you to. They pass on wisdom and knowledge, but ultimately it is up to the person to decide what they do with these lessons.

I am still at a time in my life where I still feel that I would benefit from having a mentor. I wouldn't feel comfortable being a mentor myself, but that's not often my decision to make. Mentorship is often an inevitable part of a person's life cycle. At some point I will likely have to pass on my knowledge to someone else. I will eventually be a member of the older generation.

If you enjoyed this post (or it really pissed you off) please like, share, and/or leave a comment. I love hearing from my readers and I hope you guys like hearing from me.

Until next week.

Sunday, January 14, 2018

Welcome to Folklore and Mythology Part 6: The Rise of Villains

Do you find heroes boring and one note? Would you prefer to explore the darker side of humanity? Do you enjoy laughing with an evil flare? Do you miss the days when Disney Villains were actually intimidating?

Then you might want to explore THE RISE OF VILLAINS!


They are coming for you!
Except, there aren't a lot of villain stories in folklore and mythology, are there? I mean there are a few examples of villains having stories in classic mythology. There's the story of Medea who murdered her children, but is she really a villain or tragic character? Or what about the origin story for Medusa? All of the versions of the story I'm familiar with indicate that Athena punished her after being raped by Poseidon (basically the ultimate rape shame story I've ever read).

But I don't really think of Medea and Medusa as villains.

When I think of folklore and mythological villains, I think of that evil entity that needs to be defeated so that the hero can live happily ever after. They're sort of one note entities that only exist to do bad things and showcase what is not okay behavior in the society the story was written for.

Heroes defeat villains. Every Disney movie made before 2010 made this very clear.

Who wants to join Captain Hook's crew?
Some of the stand out villains that I can name from my childhood are Lord Voldemort, Ursula, Maleficent, Gaston, and Darth Vader. They are all evil and the heroes need to defeat them to end the story. Villains might be redeemed before the end (Darth Vader), but it's not always the case. The villain also might not be the central focus of the plot, but forces attention on themselves because they are the drama queen villain (Gaston and Ursula).

But what makes a villain, a villain? The Hero's Journey has been studied to death and it's still everywhere in popular culture. So what's the opposite? Is there a Villain's Journey?

The Internet answers that question with a solid yes.

And if you guys want a solid example of the Villain's Journey, look no further than the manga/anime "Death Note" (not the Netflix movie, it doesn't exist in my universe). It completely focuses on the transformation of Light Yagami from genius student to self declared god. His path to villainy almost perfectly mirrors the Hero's Journey with a few exceptions.

So here's my version of The Villain's Journey:

WARNING - SPOILERS FOR THE ANIME/MANGA DEATH NOTE - THIS IS YOUR ONLY WARNING!
  1. Ordinary World - Starting out in the ordinary world is essential to both the Hero's and Villain's Journeys. Light starts out as a normal extremely smart high school student. All of that changes on one fateful day...
  2. Call To Adventure or The Temptation - Once again we see the similarities in the two Journeys. One random day, Light finds a strange book on the ground with weird rules about how he can kill someone just by writing their name in this book. This is the opening for Light to leave the Ordinary World and enter the Extraordinary.
  3.  Skeptical of the Call - The first step that I think separates Heroes and Villains is how they respond to the Call To Adventure step. In Light's case, he doesn't reject the call, but he is skeptical of it. He's intrigued and wants to know more about what he's been presented with. He is tempted to answer the call, but doesn't really believe what he is being offered.
  4. Meeting The Mentor - The two paths meet again at the mentor step. Much like Harry Potter has Dumbledore to guide him, Light has Ryuk. Ryuk was the one who dropped the Death Note Notebook in the first place, all because he was bored and wanted to know what a human would do with it. He tempts Light into using the notebook's powers and then guides him on how to best use them. He is entirely indifferent to how successful Light is because he can just find another human to mess with if Light proves to be too boring. Mentors don't necessarily have to be villains, but they often are. Mentors are often another challenge to overcome. Sometimes the villain has to kill their mentor to gain ultimate power or be killed by their mentor.
  5. Embracing Temptation - Villains don't cross a threshold, so much as embrace their temptation. In the case of Light, it's when he chooses to use the Death Note and kill anyone who breaks the law. He will be the one to punish them, especially if the powers at be can't punish the criminals. He takes out mobsters, murderers, and thieves left and right all while believing he is doing the right thing. He becomes the mysterious killer known as Kira.
  6. Addiction, Minions, and Adversaries - Heroes have tests to see how committed they are to their cause. Villains often find that their success comes naturally, almost too easily. They like this success, this power. It's thrilling and they want to keep feeling that thrill. It becomes an addiction. And unlike heroes, who find strength alongside their friends, villains don't need friends. They have minions. People who do things for them. Minions can be willing or unwilling. Some might be fanatical devoted fans of the villain. Misa's devotion to Light is unquestionable, neigh fanatical. She loves Light's alter ego, Kira, and will do anything to prove her love. Finally, there are adversaries. They're the ones who fight back against the villain. At first they're unsuccessful, like the police force and FBI agents looking for Kira. But then someone worthy shows up to challenge the villain. For Light, that worthy adversary is L.
  7. The Point of No Return - This is the step where a villain truly diverges from the path of redemption and heroism. They might still think they are doing the right thing, but everyone else knows the truth. The villain has fully embraced evil. Light hits this point when he chooses to kill the FBI Agent, Raye Penber, and Raye's fiance, Naomi Misora. They weren't criminals. They hadn't broken the law. They were trying to find and arrest Kira. This is when Light showed that he didn't care who got in the way of his goals. He would kill them.
  8. The Confrontation - This is when the villain is finally confronted by the hero or heroes. It could be the final show down, but it's usually not. This is when the villain is confronted by his greatest adversary. In my example, it's when Light and L start playing their games, trying to out do each other. Waiting for the other to slip up. 
  9. The Conquest - Heroes have their rewards, villains have their conquests. Here's the biggest spoiler of Death Note, despite L being Lights greatest adversary and should be the one to defeat Light/Kira. He isn't. L is ultimately killed by Light. And Light becomes the god he always wanted to be.
  10. The Reign of Terror - Villains ultimately end up in a high seat of power. We see this with Lord Voldemort, Darth Vader, and Light Yagami. Light through his alter ego Kira secures his power. He gets to decide who lives and who dies in his world. Crime virtually goes away. Some people see Light/Kira as a hero, someone who made the world a safer place. Others see the truth, that in reality, Light is an evil dictator who can choose to kill someone on a whim. What Light is doing is wrong.
  11. The Resistance - This leads to the rise resistance against the villain. This is usually external, but there are cases where there is an internal resistance, such as if the villain is seeking redemption. New heroes rise to challenge the villain and remove them from power. Near and Mellow are L's successors. They are the new leaders of the resistance against Light/Kira. Though I didn't find them as awesome as L (as did almost everyone else who followed the series), they are the ones who will ultimately bring Light/Kira down.
  12. End of the Villain - All villains will eventually be defeated. This is true of any story. Some villains end up redeeming themselves at the end of their stories. Most are either imprisoned or killed. Light is ultimately defeated by his own ego. He doesn't think as highly of Mellow and Near as he did L. This leads him to making mistakes and is eventually cornered. Ryuk, seeing that this is the end of his fun, write's Light's name in the Death Note, killing him. 
This 12 Step Guide is really just that, a guide. Villains are known for taking short cuts and finding the path of least resistance. But I think that you could take the journey that I've outlined above and find a way to apply to many different villain stories. Lord Voldemort would easily fit this outline, as would Darth Vader. 

Prince Zuko from "Avatar - The Last Airbender" would also be an interesting case to look at. He's one of those cases where chooses to redeem himself at the end of his journey to become part of Team Avatar. (Actually "Avatar - The Last Airbender" is probably one of the greatest examples of epic modern storytelling).

What makes Light such a cool villain isn't that he ever thought he was evil. He never once thought he was doing the wrong thing. He wanted a world rid of crime and he got what he wanted. Light thought he was a good guy, but he wasn't. He was the villain of his own story. 

Like I wrote above, most villains in classic mythology and folklore don't get a story arc. They are simply The Villain. But I can think of at least one example of the this journey in folklore and religion, that of the Fall of Lucifer. He is the ultimate villain for a lot of people and he had to have gone on some kind of journey to go from most beloved angel to greatest adversary to God.

Stories about heroes and villains have always been popular. They are the stories about good versus evil that we loved as children. Though they can be complex at times, they're usually fairly simple in premise. 

Villains teach us a lot of things. They show us how not to act. They show us what can happen when someone has ultimate power. And they can show us how someone who believes they doing good are actually evil.

Until next week.

If you enjoyed this post (or it really pissed you off) please like, share, and/or leave a comment. I love hearing from my readers and I hope you guys like hearing from me. Let me know if there's something you'd like me to cover in my series on Folklore and Mythology. I can't promise to work it in, but I'll try to get to it before I move on to a new topic.

Sunday, January 7, 2018

Welcome to Folklore and Mythology Part 5: The Path of Heroes

Happy 2018!

It's a new year and I'm still writing about Folklore and Mythology. And why not? Storytelling is in a fundamental part of our humanity. I don't think I know a single culture that doesn't have a culture of story telling. It's how we pass down our history, morals, and dreams to the next generation.

And wouldn't you guys know it, there was a documentary on mythology on Netflix that popped up the minute I got home. I watched all six episodes of Myths and Monsters in the span of two days. I wasn't super impressed that they only really focused on European mythologies, though. There are a lot of great myths from all over the world, but I digress.

The first episode of this series was about Heroes and Villains, specifically the Hero's Journey. The theory was first introduced by Joseph Campbell in his book The Hero with a Thousand Faces (note to self: find a copy of this book asap). In it, he claims that most myths and legends about heroes follow the same 12 steps, known as the Hero's Journey.

The call of the adventure! Thank you Dr. Seuss.
The episode then uses Star Wars as an example of this journey. Since the latest Star Wars movie came out less than a month ago, I found this very appropriate. Star Wars has become a modern myth and the first three movies are a classic example of good versus evil often found in myths from our ancestors. Looking deeper at the stories I consumed as a child, I realized that there are many other examples of the Hero's Journey, including Harry Potter.

Since Star Wars has been used to death to show this journey, I'm going to use Harry Potter to showcase the 12 step program to become a hero. For the record the Hero's Journey is flexible and doesn't have to follow the steps as I have listed here. By the way, this will contain spoilers if you haven't read all of the books. THIS IS YOUR ONLY WARNING.
  1. Starting off in the Ordinary World - Harry is in the Non-Magical World or Muggle World when we first meet him as an 11 year old boy.
  2. The Call to Adventure - Harry is given a letter telling him he's been accepted to Hogwarts: School of Witchcraft and Wizardry.
  3. Refusal to Answer the Call - So, I don't like the wording of this one. I wouldn't call it a refusal, so much as a hesitance to answer the call. For example, Harry has to go to school no matter what. He can't refuse to go to school. His refusal instead takes two different forms. The first is his aunt and uncle telling him that the whole thing is crazy and that he can't possibly be going to a magical school. The second is his aversion to being treated like a celebrity once he gets there.
  4. Meeting the Mentor - Or in Harry's case mentors who are his teachers. Yes, Dumbledore takes a special interest in Harry because he's "The Boy Who Lived" and is the main mentor, but Lupin or McGonagall or Hagrid also mentor Harry from time to time. 
  5. Crossing the Threshold - One can argue that Harry does this when he steps through the barrier to Platform 9 and 3/4 or when he sees Hogwarts for the very first time, but I disagree. I think that this moment happens the instant he is sorted into Gryffindor. This is when Harry makes his first active choice in the Wizarding World (no going to school doesn't count). He chooses to be placed in Gryffindor house over Slytherin. It's Harry's first decision and sets the tone for the rest of the series.
  6. Test, Friends, and Enemies - Throughout Harry's time at Hogwarts he is constantly tested (inside the classroom and out) in his magical abilities. He always has finals at the end of the school year as well as one major battle against Voldemort or one of his followers that shows how much he's grown throughout that year. He also makes a lot of friends. Ron and Hermione are without doubt Harry's two best friends, but they aren't his only friends. By the end of the series he has so many people who are willing to fight for/with him that it could easily compare it to a Shonen Manga (think Naruto or One Piece). The same goes for his enemies, starting out with Draco Malfoy and leading up to Voldemort and all of his Death Eaters. For the record, I think this is the largest and most time consuming of this 12 step program.
  7. Approach to the Inmost Cave - Despite the confusing name to this step, I think it's pretty clear which step this corresponds to for Harry and his Friends - the entire first two thirds of the seventh Harry Potter book. By this point in the series, things have become desperate for our hero. He can't go back to Hogwarts, a place that had always been safe in the past, and instead must find seven objects that must be destroyed so that he can vanquish Lord Voldemort for good. I'm sure others could argue that when Harry chooses to confront Voldemort in the woods one last time, but I think this takes away from the growth Harry has to go through in the seventh book.
  8. The Ordeal - This is the metaphorical and occasionally physical "death" of the hero. For Harry, it's the first part of the Battle of Hogwarts. He's just put all of his friends in danger by returning to the school, found out that Dumbledore knew he was the final "object" that needed to be destroyed, and that he had to die so that everyone he loved would be able to live. The Ordeal ends when Voldemort ends Harry's life in a flash of green.
  9. The Reward - Harry is allowed to chose whether he wants to live or die. I have mixed feelings on this. On the one hand, I was all for Harry choosing to die and finally be at peace. If this had happened, Neville or Ron could have stepped up to lead the final charge, creating a new hero for everyone to rally behind. It would have been a fitting ending, but not necessarily completed the Hero's Journey. Instead he chooses option two: to come back to life. His "reward" isn't just that he gets to make this choice. It also includes protection for his friends because he sacrificed himself to save them.
  10. The Road Back - Basically when Voldemort makes Hagrid carry Harry back to Hogwarts. 
  11. Resurrection - Part 2 of the Battle of Hogwarts. As Voldemort and his followers arrive back at Hogwarts, everyone thinks Harry is dead (his body is lying limp in Hagrid's arms after all). But then, Neville makes an amazing speech, rallying the remaining good guys. Voldemort responds by placing The Sorting Hat, while it's on fire, onto Neville's head. Neville pulls the sword of Gryffindor out of The Hat, allowing Harry to make his grand entrance as newly resurrected. This step ends when Voldemort dies when the curse he killed Harry with rebounds onto himself (this scene was so much better in the books).
  12. The Return - Technically this step has a longer name, but I'm ignoring it. Harry defeats Voldemort, we're given a comforting scene in the Headmaster's Office with just him, Ron, and Hermione. Harry is at peace, but he's not the same 11 year old boy who started his journey. He's older, wiser, and ready to live a somewhat normal life in the Wizarding World. We're then given an epilogue 19 years later with Harry sending two of his children off to Hogwarts. It's the happy ending the fans wanted and JK Rowling gave us (ignoring the play that recently came out of course).
Well that was long and sure some of the Steps in this 12 Step Program to go on your very own Hero's Journey don't always align. Heck, Harry isn't the only one to go on the journey in this series. Neville also goes through it, even if we only see part of his journey (most of it takes place off screen during the 7th book). Cedric Diggory starts his own, but is tragically killed before he can complete it. 

And Harry's journey doesn't exactly fit the steps as they are presented. I had to make a few examples fit and arguments could be made for different events in Harry's story to be used. 

This also isn't the only way to define how a hero is made. It's just a theory (more like a pattern) that was noticed by the scholar, Joseph Campbell. It's heavily skewed towards European myths and legends. Though there are examples of this pattern showing up in the ancient world outside of Europe, it isn't a general rule. I would argue that the story Journey to the West (as I remember it) doesn't quite fit this mold. The story of David and Goliath could also be considered a Hero's Journey story and doesn't seem to fit the pattern (again, I'm going off of memory...it's been a while since I read it).

Harry's story is both modern and ancient. It's unique and new, while giving us a sense of familiarity. His story pushes our cultural boundaries, while also passing on a story telling tradition that goes back thousands of years. Fitting, as JK Rowling is a fan of classical literature. 

My point is, the heroes I am most familiar with in both ancient mythology and modern stories, often follow similar journeys to become a hero. It's a pattern that some of us really like and can easily identify with. 

Because if we know the 12 Step Program to becoming a Hero, we might be able to follow it and become Heroes ourselves. Now wouldn't that be a dream come true.

Next week, we'll look at a slightly different journey: The Villains Journey.

If you enjoyed this post (or it really pissed you off) please like, share, and/or leave a comment. I love hearing from my readers and I hope you guys like hearing from me.

Until next week! Muahahahaha!

Sunday, August 27, 2017

Welcome to Character Inspirations

After 4 years of producing one blog post a week (give or take a few skips here and there), I've finally hit my 200th post. I wasn't sure what I wanted to write about this week. I've been working on the icon series for a few weeks now, but I wasn't sold on the idea of limiting myself to my personal icons.

Instead I wanted to write about the many characters in books and graphic novels that have inspired me. They aren't in any order and there aren't any ranks.



1) Nancy Drew - she was my first strong female role model in books. For a long time all I would read were Nancy Drew books. I hope she keeps inspiring generations of young girls.

2) Cassie Logan - she was my second biggest female role model in books. I would recommend to anyone to read Roll of Thunder, Hear My Cry at least once in their life. 

3) The Golden Trio from the Harry Potter Books (because I just can't pick one)- I was at the perfect age to grow up with Harry, Ron, and Hermione. These books shaped my childhood and continue to shape my imagination.

4) Asterix - Asterix was my first comic book hero. He and his good friend Obelix protected their village from the Roman invaders and went on tons of adventures. 

5) Jim Hawkins - I read Treasure Island in my early 20s and I wish I had read it sooner. It was a fun read and a great adventure novel. 

6) Tohru Honda - Fruits Basket was really popular in my middle and high school, which is how I got interested in the series. I loved all the characters, but Tohru really stands out as someone special. She's the most accepting character I've ever come across in literature and she really wants her friends and family to be happy.

7) Sherlock Holmes - I love the mysteries Sir Arthur Conan Doyle wrote. I also like the many new interpretations that have come out. I don't know how much I'd want to be like Sherlock, but he doesn't seem to care what anyone else thinks of him. He's fascinating person and isn't boring in the slightest.

8) Alice of Alice's Adventures in Wonderland and Through the Looking Glass - I love these books and the Disney animated movie. Alice is a true dreamer in every sense of the word.

9) Yusuke Urameshi - He might not be very smart and be a bit of a delinquent, but deep down he has a good heart and is super loyal to those he cares about. Yu Yu Hakusho was one of the first manga I read and I would recommend it to anyone who likes great characters with interesting stories to tell.

Each of these characters have their strengths and their faults. They're all very different characters and have very different stories to tell. Some people might not like the characters at all. 

What makes a character interesting or inspiring is left up to the reader. Yes, the author has the important job of shaping the character, but the reader is the one interpreting and judging them. I have found that the characters I love and am inspired by most are often very flawed, but are still able to do amazing things while flawed.

If you haven't read any of the books or graphic novels I have listed above, I totally recommend each of them.

What I have learned from each of these characters is to

Be as inquisitive as Nancy
Be as strong as Cassie
Have friends like Harry, Ron, and Hermione
Be as confident as Asterix
Be as adventurous as Jim
Be as accepting as Tohru
Be as fascinating as Sherlock
Be a dreamer like Alice
Be as loyal as Yusuke

And follow my own path to build my own story.

Thanks for sticking with me for 200 blog posts. Until next week...

Sunday, June 4, 2017

Welcome to Monsters Part 3: The Monsters That Just Need a Hug

Who didn't have that one friend who absolutely loved Remus Lupin in the Harry Potter series? Or maybe I really was the only person surrounded by his fan girls.

I swear that this picture is relevant...
Regardless, Remus Lupin made Harry Potter fans everywhere sympathetic to werewolves in a time when werewolves were still seen as evil creatures that needed to be destroyed (basically before there was a Teen Paranormal Romance section at Barnes and Nobles). He is probably one of the first examples J.K. Rowling gave us of someone who chooses to be "good" despite what society defines them as.

The fact that J.K. Rowling created characters who made choices and weren't evil because of who they were born as is a major theme of the Harry Potter series. This message is made extremely clear in book 4 (Goblet of Fire) when Dumbledore says to the Minister for Magic, Cornelius Fudge "it matters not what someone is born, but what they grow to be." This stands in sharp contrast to a lot of fantasy troupes that were seen all over the place in popular culture before these books. The best (and most well known) example of evil by virtue of birth are the Orcs from The Lord of the Rings trilogy.

The scene where we discover that Lupin is a werewolf (at least in the books) shows the extreme prejudice he faces every day. Harry is noticeably the only member of the Golden Trio to not react badly at the declaration that Lupin is a werewolf. Both Ron and Hermione show open distrust and hostility once the secret is revealed. They quickly change their minds about Lupin, but their initial reaction still stands as pretty normal when a wizard meets a werewolf. The only reason Remus Lupin might be considered a monster is because he turns into a werewolf once a month.

Remus Lupin isn't the first example of a sympathetic "monster". There's also the Beast from Beauty and the Beast, David in An American Werewolf in London, and an argument can even be made for Tony Stark from the Marvel Cinematic Universe. Each is put in a position where they are seen as a villain or monster to someone else, but are just trying to make the best of a bad situation.

The character David from An American Werewolf in London (much like his predecessor Larry Talbot from the 1941 The Wolf Man) is bitten by a werewolf. However, unlike the situation Remus Lupin found himself in, David has zero resources to help him during his transformations. He spends a good chunk of the second part of the film seeing hallucinations of the people he has violently killed while a werewolf. The hallucinations tell him what an awful person he is and that he should kill himself before he can kill anyone else.

(Next paragraph contains spoilers for An American Werewolf in London. This is your only warning!)

By the end of An American Werewolf in London, I sincerely wanted David to have a happy ending. I really did. Though, his mental health had significantly deteriorated and he knows he is responsible for the murders he commuted while transformed, it is still very clear that he wanted to live. But (spoilers) monsters don't get happy endings in these types of stories. Much like Larry Talbot before him, David is cornered in his werewolf form and shot to death. What is most tragic is that David seems almost relieved to die.

I may or may not have cried...a lot.

Werewolves seem to have a much more sympathetic representation in our popular culture than say vampires or zombies. Maybe it's because it's easy to identify with the werewolf condition. J.K. Rowling has been quoted as saying she used Lupin's condition as "a metaphor for those illnesses that carry a stigma, like HIV and AIDS." And unlike the vampire and zombie condition, which is constant, werewolves typically look and act like normal people until their affliction takes control.

That's not to say that vampires or zombies can't be sympathetic. The scene in Shawn of the Dead where Shawn has to kill his mother, is incredibly sad. Thankfully that movie has a somewhat happy, and pretty ridiculous, ending. But it does drive home the fact that the zombies were once humans who were loved.

Then there are monsters like The Beast from Beauty and the Beast. As a human, The Beast (or Prince Adam as dubbed by his adoring fans) had a personality that was severely lacking in empathy and charity. This leads to his curse and monstrous form.

I know that if I were in Belle's shoes, I would have screamed bloody murder. The Beast looks terrifying, especially since we first see him in the shadows of a dungeon. Though Belle reacts to his terrifying looks by shirking away from him with a gasp, she is able to look past his appearance (and he stops being a jerk to her) to fall in love with him. However, when Belle shows the image of The Beast to the villagers, they immediately form a mob and go off to "kill The Beast!"

This sequence of events leads to one of my favorite lines in the Disney version of Beauty and the Beast: "we don't like what we don't understand, in fact it scares us, and this monster is mysterious at least." Society judges The Beast to be a monster simply by how he looks. The Beast is tired and thinks he is doomed to spend the rest of his existence as a monster. At this point, he doesn't care if Gaston and the villagers are going to kill him or not. It isn't until Belle reappears that The Beast is able to find the will to live.

The villagers panic over the fact that The Beast looks scary even though he has never actually done anything to them. They have zero reasons to try and kill him.

There's actually a real life example of people hiding away from society due to a scary appearance. Raymond Robinson (1910 - 1985), also known as the Green Man, became horribly deformed in a childhood accident. To prevent people from panicking when they saw him, he would only go out at night and stay away from the main parts of his hometown. He eventually became a local legend known as the Green Man. Some people in his local community were shocked to discover that he really did exist and had an unfortunate even in his life take place.

But what about the monsters who don't look like monsters? Or, more specifically, what about the people who do terrible things because they think they have to?

I mentioned Tony Stark from the Marvel Cinematic Universe (I'm not as familiar with his other media) earlier in this post and some of you might be wondering why. To be honest, Tony's ego is his biggest weakness and is what qualifies him to being a monster. It's because of Tony that Ultron destroyed the capital city of Sokovia. If Ultron hadn't had done that, we wouldn't have had half the plot of Civil War.

Speaking of Captain America: Civil War, I backed Captain America during that whole movie. What Tony was asking them to do was to essentially give up their freedom, especially Wanda. Yes, I understood his point about someone keeping the heroes in check and making sure someone was held responsible for when innocent lives are lost (a topic for another time), but Steve Rogers made some really good points too. It also didn't help that Tony locked up half the Avengers after they rebelled against the agreement in the movie.

Tony has some good arguments and tries to do the right thing, but his actions tend to be way too extreme and hurt the people he is closes to. He is the type of monster people don't realize is a monster until they are in his crosshairs. Locking up Wanda instead of trying to help her was a really bad thing to do and stands in sharp contrast to Steve seeing the best in everyone. By the end of the movie, I did feel bad for Tony. He wasn't necessarily wrong with his arguments, but his actions were and he could very easily end up alone because of that.

At the end of Civil War, I saw someone who was devastated by their own actions, even though they still thought they were doing the right thing. I wasn't sure if I wanted to smack him or hug him. Hopefully James Rhodes will be able to get Tony to see where he went wrong.

So not all monsters are the Orcs of Middle Earth. Some have been cast out of society due to things that are entirely out of their control. Others wanted to do the right thing, but instead hurt those they care about most. These characters are important because not everything in life can be put into a "good" or "evil" box.

Life is complicated and tough to figure out. Sometimes it's the monster that needs saving.

If you enjoyed this post (or it really pissed you off) please like, share, and/or leave a comment. I love hearing from my readers and I hope you guys like hearing from me.

Until next week.

Sunday, March 19, 2017

Welcome to a Fairy Tale Adventure

When first I saw that Disney was making a live action Beauty and the Beast movie (one of my favorites from when I was a kid), I thought - well that's completely unnecessary. Then I saw the trailers and listened to the music. I just knew I had to see this movie, even if I did have to sit in a theater with an army of little girls decked out in their best princess outfits.



It was so worth it.

There's just something amazing about seeing the magic of a fairy tale come to life on the big screen. Though, personally I would have been even more thrilled if they had re-released the animated movie in theaters, but the live action movie was a lot better than I originally thought it would be. I still like the original more, but that's my opinion. It was also really cool to see how much technology has changed (especially if you compare the new movie to the 1946 French movie).

The inner child in me was so happy to see this movie that I, of course, went home and put the animated version on right away. While singing along and cleaning my apartment, I was struck by a line Belle sings after she rejects Gaston's marriage proposal.

"I want adventure in the great wide somewhere. I want it more than I can tell."

I've seen that line dozens of times on social media. I think there's even a meme floating around with Belle's arms flung open in the field where she's singing.

It's a good line and I think it sums up half of the reason I love of fairy tales (and fantasy and science fiction). It's that longing for an unexpected adventure. Where my mind is so completely blown away with everything that happens, that it's hard to express my awe. It's being able to leave the boring world behind and go somewhere completely unexpected.

I can't be the only person who feels this way.

Many of the stories I enjoyed as a child had heroes that somehow found themselves embroiled in an unusual situation.

For example, the Hobbit starts with Bilbo enjoying his morning, he meets Gandalf, then later that evening a party of dwarves unexpectedly, and suddenly Bilbo is being hired as a burgle to steal something from a dragon. The ordinary quickly becomes the extraordinary in the span of a day.

Or how about how Aladdin comes across the magic genie*? He starts out his day casually stealing breakfast, accidentally comes across a runaway princess, gets arrested, and is then tricked by Jafar into going into the Cave of Wonders. I don't think Aladdin got up that morning and thought, yes today is the day that I go on an adventure.

 The other half of my love for fairy tale stories is likely because of magic.

Yeah, I know magic doesn't actually exist (or does it?), but it can signify how the improbable becomes the possible. I might not have gotten my letter to Hogwarts (or Ilvermorny), but neither did Jacob Kowalski and he got to help Newt with his escaped Fantastic Beasts. I don't expect to stumble upon a seemingly abandoned castle with sentient furniture while hiking (actually that would be really impressive since I live in North America), but neither was Maurice while he was looking for shelter.

Okay yeah, all those examples were stories and movies. They were created to teach entertaining lessons. Some even used to provide an explanation for the unknown world. But nearly all of them continue to inspire our imaginations today.

Adventures happen, even without magic and singing demigods. Some are planned vacations to new counties, others are unexpected (like having a random snow storm in mid March). Without the ordinary days, it's hard to appreciate the extraordinary ones.

Then again, I could have met a witch or wizard, but don't remember because my memory was oblivated. It could have happened.

If you enjoyed this post (or it really pissed you off) please like, share, and/or leave a comment. I love hearing from my readers and I hope you guys like hearing from me.

Until next week.

*I actually know a couple different versions of this story, but I'm using the Disney version as an example since more people are familiar with it.

Sunday, November 13, 2016

Welcome to Empathy

Emotions are a part of being human. Every single person has the ability to feel their own emotions. We like to experience happiness. We try to avoid disappointment. We want to be loved. Emotions, no matter how much some of us might try to deny it (*cough me *cough), play a major role in the decisions that we make.

We cannot escape the emotions we feel.

Emotions are often the driving force behind my actions. I go to amusement parks because I love how roller coasters make me happy. I read mysteries because solving the plot before the main character does makes me feel smart. I tend to go hide when I'm angry because I've been known to do some pretty stupid and destructive things when I'm feeling extreme anger.


These are all valid emotions I have felt at one point or another. I am also not the only person who acts upon the strong emotions. I might forget that on occasion (which is not one of my better traits), especially when I'm arguing with my sibling about something. These arguments tend to quickly descend into screaming matches and it can take a while for us to forgive each other.


Emotions are what separate us from machines and computers. Granted, artificial intelligence is getting pretty good at recognizing and responding to human's emotions, but there is one thing a machine can not be programmed to do. A machine cannot be empathetic.

Empathy is the ability to understand and share feelings with another individual. I've also heard it described as feeling the exact emotions another person is feeling. It shouldn't be confused with sympathy, which is feeling pity or sorrow for someone's misfortune.

One of the best quotes or analogies I've heard for empathy is that you can never know what someone else is going through until you've walked a mile in their shoes. It's a good analogy. After all everyone has a slightly different world view and might have a different perspective to share.

 But is it the best analogy?

The funny thing about shoes is that they are made to fit the size of a person's feet. A person can't control the size of their feet, so they need to be able to find shoes that fit well enough not to pinch their toes and aren't so large that they trip. Just because I can fit perfectly into one pair of shoes doesn't  mean that I can fit into sibling's shoes, or my coworker, or even the shoes of my readers.

How can I walk a mile in someone else's shoes, when I can't get my feet to into them?

Sometimes I need a little help.

Books and movies (and comic books) are great mediums for evoking emphatic emotions. The ones that are the most popular and have the most staying power are also usually the ones that connect best with us on an emotional level. There's always at least one character (hopefully the protagonist) that we, as an audience, can identify with and root for throughout the course of the story.

These stories can become so powerful, that they start to take on a life of their own. They gain fans who celebrate the characters and how they overcame their challenges. Conventions might start popping up, so that fans can gather in groups and discuss how these stories changed their lives.

A good example of stories that touched lives for my generation would be the Harry Potter books. We, the audience, are introduced to a magical world along side Harry in the first book. When he is amazed by the moving pictures, so are we. We, the audience, are able to empathize with Harry's experiences and opinions because the books are told from his perspective. We are figuratively in Harry's shoes throughout the entire series.

 Harry is introduced to a lot of new and wonderful people when he arrives in the magical world at the same time we are. He's also faced with tough challenges and people who want to see him silenced (Dolores Umbridge) or dead (Voldemort and his Death Eaters). Throughout all of these encounters we are seeing everything through Harry's perspective and emotions.

Harry starts out as a wide eyed curious kid in the first few books. His innocence is shattered at the end of the fourth book with the death of Cedric Diggory. We have to put up with him being an angsty teenager throughout the entirety of the fifth book (and a few parts of the third book). We also get to witness him destroy Dumbledore's office while he is trying to work through his anger and pain at the death of Sirius Black. We're able to understand the relief and happiness he feels when he's finally defeated Voldemort.

Through Harry's perspective, we know who the bad guys are and we know who the good guys are. We also know there are people who aren't good or bad, but they do cause a lot of problems for Harry (an example would be Fudge). There are also the people we see make choices out of anger that later turn out to be really bad mistakes (Percy Weasley).

We tend to ignore or miss the same things Harry does. For example, Harry hero worships his father and his godfather, to the point where they can almost do no wrong in his opinion. However, there are clear signs that that wasn't the case. James Potter and Sirius Black were good people, there's no denying that. They probably wouldn't have befriended Remus Lupin if they weren't. They were also bullies.

Oh, I'm sure James and Sirius didn't think they were the bullies. If I were to guess, I'd say they felt that they were targeting the "real bullies". Snape was a known favorite target for them to harass and he hung out with a lot of people who would eventually become Death Eaters. James and Sirius did push Snape too far with their bullying and Snape lost his best friend and love interest Lily Potter (nee Evans) because of it. Snape called Lily a "mudblood" in front of a large group of people and I'll bet right then and there that James and Sirius felt that what they were doing to Snape was completely justified. Snape proved he was hateful against muggle born wizards. James and Sirius would never use such hateful words to describe someone, they felt that they were better than that.

Throughout the fifth book, you start to see some of the signs that Sirius was extremely flawed. There were a couple of comments made by Lupin at the very beginning after Harry isn't picked to be a prefect. There's Sirius's treatment of Kreacher, someone who has no rights and had been neglected for years. Finally there's Harry's journey into Snape's memories where we see a confrontation between James, Sirius, and Snape. Despite all of these signs, Harry still continues to idolize Sirius and his father.

It isn't until much later that Harry realizes these very obvious flaws led to Sirius' downfall. And it does take him a while to figure this out (two more books longer). At first Harry is totally consumed by anger. He tries to use the cruciatus curse to torture Bellatrix and even comes close to casting the killing curse while Voldemort is goading him on. He destroys much of Dumbledore's office while he rages.

Dumbledore is able to stop Harry from taking his anger out on Kreacher. Yeah, about Kreacher, the movies don't really get into it, but he was the key to Sirius' death. After dealing with Sirius' abuse for half a year, Kreacher goes to Narcissa and Bellatrix for comfort. They were kind to Kreacher and maybe even sympathetic. It probably didn't take much convincing to get Kreacher to tell them everything about Harry and Sirius' father-son relationship. They in turn told Voldemort all of this and Voldemort convinced Harry that Sirius was in serious danger. When Harry tries to check on Sirius, he is met with Kreacher, who lies and says that Sirius is missing. Harry walks right into a trap which leads to Sirius dying.

It takes Harry over a year to forgive Kreacher and he almost doesn't. Dumbledore and Hermione have to point out to Harry how awful Sirius treated Kreacher and there was very little Kreacher could do to stop the abuse. He also has to learn about Kreacher's relationship with Regulus Black (the most unsung hero of the entire series I might add) for him to reach a turning point with his own relationship with the house elf. He is also able to empathize with Kreacher's experience in the cave from the sixth book.

Harry finally realizes that despite all of the good things his godfather did, he also did a lot of bad things. Remus even tells Harry that he never stood up to his best friends because he was scared that they would turn on him and tell everyone that he was a werewolf. This realization also probably helped Harry realize that other people he looked up to had flaws. He gets mad at Remus when he offers to join the golden trio hunting for horcruxes and would leave his wife and unborn child behind. Harry understands why Aberforth was estranged from his brother.

We are only able to realize these things because we are walking in Harry's shoes through all of it. J. K. Rowling did a fantastic job teaching us that the good guys didn't always do the right thing and that sometimes the bad guys did (Narcissa and Snape are the two best examples). She wrote a story that we were able to identify and empathize with.

We all see the world differently. We are the main characters in our own personal stories (though I occasionally feel like a side character, but that's another blog post). Unfortunately we are the only ones who understand what we feel at every second. It can be really hard to understand why someone else makes a choice that you yourself would never make.

Empathy is tough. There are some shoes that I will never be able to fit into, but boy oh boy will I try. The emotions people feel are very real. They can't always be controlled.

If you enjoyed this post (or it really pissed you off), please like, share, and/or leave a comment. I love hearing from my readers and I hope you guys like hearing from me. Until next week.

Sunday, July 31, 2016

Welcome to the Beyond

If you guys haven't guessed from the title, I just saw Star Trek Beyond. It's a fun movie (and a little bitter sweet since the deaths of Leonard Nimoy and Anton Yelchin) and I enjoyed it. Star Trek, both the original and The Next Generation, were a big part of my childhood, much like Harry Potter, Lord of the Rings, Sailor Moon, Pokemon, and of course Star Wars.

It's possible that all of the Fantasy and Science Fiction stories helped shape my crazy imagination. Like many kids, I wanted to be one of the "good guys" who fought the "bad guys". I wanted to do amazing deeds that required a lot of courage and prove how awesome I was (think kid logic, which includes slaying dragons and being able to build a super computer). I wanted to explore the unknown from the far reaches of space to the depths of the deepest ocean.

I will defeat the dragon!

The adventures my fictional heroes went on we're awesome and I wanted to be a similar hero (well at least a good mix of the diplomatic Captain Picard, the kicka$$ nature of Captain Kirk, the kindness of Harry Potter, and the loyalty of Luke Skywalker) who went on similar adventures.

All of these great adventures have conflict. Star Wars was probably my introduction into the "good versus evil" narrative. Luke and his friends were the good guys fighting the evil empire. Similarly Sailor Moon was also a classic fight between the good sailor scouts and the evil forces of the negaverse (Luna has the best pronunciation of this). Harry Potter and Lord of the Rings are also good examples of the good versus evil narrative (Harry versus Lord Voldemort and the Fellowship/free people of Middle Earth versus Sauron), but there was also something a little more complicated about them.

Lord of the Rings taught me about the importance of friendship (Legolas and Gimli) and that the hero sometimes comes back with scars that will never fully heal (Frodo). Sure the good and evil ideas are a little too separated with the stereotyping of the different races (see World of Warcraft if you want a good representation of orcs by the way). However, Lord of the Rings made it very clear that not all heroes leave their adventures unscathed.

Harry Potter taught me a lot about the grey areas of "good" and "evil". The story taught me that just
because someone might have been a Death Eater didn't mean that they continued to be after they learned a hard truth (looking at Snape and Regulus Black). It taught me that heroes and mentors are important, but even they have flaws (Sirius Black and Remus Lupin). The books also taught me that you can't necessarily trust those in authoritative positions (Umbridge) or that people you think are very wise can make very bad mistakes (Dumbledore).

Pokemon was one of those rare gems that defined a generation. It emphasized team work and friendship. Sure there were "bad guys" (yeah Team Rocket was pretty bad for stealing rare Pokemon), but Jesse, James, and Meowth all had a great backstory that told the viewers why they were doing what they were doing. Yes, they were in the wrong most most of the time, but you couldn't help sympathizing with them once you learned more about them. However the overall theme of Pokemon was one of exploration and friendship.

Star Trek, though, is a whole other can of worms. If Star Trek taught me anything, it was to continue to explore and never outgrow a sense of wonder and curiosity. Well, those are the biggest things I took away from it as a child.

The other major thing that Star Trek taught me (rather than all of the other previously mentioned franchises) was to not fear the unknown. Think about it, the purpose of Star Trek was the explore the unknown. They had no idea if the next day would be their last, not because someone was actively trying to kill them, but because of an unknown entity accidentally killing them or a delicate diplomatic situation. Captain Kirk and Picard always seemed to get out of the toughest situations. They had a great crew and a ton of pseudo-science techno babble to back them up. Heck, Captain Kirk didn't even believe in the "no win situation", while Captain Picard went up against the Borg, an enemy that could adapt to any situation.

As a child the "good versus evil narrative" of Star Wars and Sailor Moon was easy to understand and recreate. As an adult, the unknown of Star Trek and grey areas of Harry Potter are what resonates the most with me. Yes, the new Star Trek movies have their "bad guys", but what made the show great doesn't necessarily make a great movie. The TV shows, though, had a lot more to them. While the Harry Potter universe keeps expanding and the "happily ever after" I long for seems more and more out of reach.

As much as I'd like to say that there is a "bad guy" or "bad situation" in my life that I need to defeat, there aren't. My main source of conflict is the "unknown" (which I believe I've written about before), myself (I am my biggest critic after all), and the grey areas that don't seem to have a solution. Which makes Star Trek, the show, a lot more relatable than many of my other childhood fantasies. They solved their problems through creativity, diplomacy, and a little bit of intense action.

There are many days where I ask myself "what the hell I think I'm doing." I wonder why I'm not the explorer or hero I always dreamed I would be. Then I remember that I have bills to pay and plants to water. As much as I'd love an unexpected adventure (like Mr. Bilbo running off with the dwarfs of Middle Earth), I know that I have responsibilities that need to be taken care of. I might not be as free spirited as I want to be, but at least my imagination fills in the gaps.

Though I still don't know what my future holds (although there is that trip to Iceland coming up), I don't think I'm unprepared for it. I may love my routines and stability, but what would life be like without the unknown showing up to spice things up? The stories I grew up with helped to shape who I am as an adult. Hopefully I make good decisions.

After all, I still have a lot of living to do. I can only do my very best, continue to learn, and admit when I've made a mistake. Maybe I will leave a legacy behind, maybe I'll be forgotten with time. The Universe will just have to wait an see. In the words of Buzz Lightyear of Star Command: "To infinity and beyond."

Until next week.

If you enjoyed this post (or it really pissed you off), please like, share, and/or leave a commend. I love hearing from my readers and I hop you guys love hearing from me. Now, go revisit your childhood, before reality sets in.

Sunday, May 10, 2015

Welcome To Moving Part 2

The boxes, oh the boxes...

Before I begin, I'd like to give a shout out to my mom. Happy Mother's Day! I hope you are having fun with the rest of the aunts. I am happy you're my mom. Have a beer for me.

Now back to our regularly scheduled blog post...

 
This week was a challenge in unpacking. I honestly wish I could just wave my hands, say some magic spell like in Harry Potter, and have everything put exactly where it needs to be. I'm not a wizard in the Harry Potter world, so I can't do that.

No, this week I spent unpacking all of my stuff and finding places for it to go. My roommate has been very kind and understanding. In fact I just managed to get the last big box out of the apartment a few hours ago. I feel accomplished (even if my bed still has a million and a half things piled on it that I need to put somewhere before I sleep tonight.

At least I've found everything...or at least I think I have. There were a few boxes that had been misplaced (mostly pillows), but I did end up finding them eventually. I have also brought some new containers that fit nicely under my bed.

My biggest advice when it comes to unpacking is set a goal of at least one box per day...and maybe take a few items out of the car.

It's certainly a process and if you can find help, take it. My wonderful cousin and his wife came down on Friday to help me move somethings and just hang out. It was nice seeing a familiar face. I think the hardest part of all of this was that I did it by myself.

It's a hard thing to do and if you don't have someone there with you it can feel like the world is ending. At least if I have to move again by myself I know what to expect, but I highly recommend having a friend or family member help.

I need to go finish cleaning off my bed. Hopefully I get some sleep soon.

Until next week.

If you enjoyed this post (or it really pissed you off), please like, share, and/or leave a comment. I love hearing from my readers and I hope you like hearing from me. Now, back to unpacking.

Sunday, August 3, 2014

Welcome To Alternative Culture

Because Normal Is Vastly Overrated...

This past weekend I went to BronyCon. I honestly did not know what to expect. It was my first Con and I had a lot of fun. It's an interesting story about how I found myself surrounded by fans for a show called "My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic".



My ex significant other (yes they are an ex now, we haven't gotten around to changing our profiles yet on social media) had been a big fan of the music movement surrounding the Brony movement. They were also a fan of the show. For my readers who do not know, a Brony is typically an adult male fan of the show "My Little Pony: Friendship is Magic". However the term Brony is occasionally applied to any adult who is a part of the fandom.

The fandom is huge. I have gotten into the music as well and there are a ton of fan made songs for the show. They are really good and the performers are excellent to watch life. I really like the alternative rock songs myself.  

However a lot of people find it odd that Bronies or really any fandom (other than sports) exist. I don't because fandoms have existed for a long time (see Trekkie for reference). They're really just another medium for people to express themselves with. A creative outlet to escape from reality.

And sometimes it goes against what is the current culture (I repeat see the history of Trekkie for details). It's different and a little odd, but that doesn't mean it's a bad thing. It makes life interesting.

Most people still view comic books and cartoons as being strictly for children, yet people continue to enjoy them well into their adult years (the existence of ComicCon is proof of this). The question is why. Why are shows, stories and other mediums typically geared towards children able to create huge followings that span generations?

I think the simplest answer is: the story. All of these things exist because people enjoy the story. Either because they loved it as a child or have found stumbled upon it as an adult. They find it engaging. That's why I love anime, manga (Japanese comic books) and comic books. There's the conflict, the adventure and the ability to watch characters grow from facing their challenges. It pulls on a person's emotions and makes them beg for more. Even going so far as to help a person struggling with their own challenges.

How many young girls identified with Hermione from Harry Potter because she was a cool bookish heroine? How many young men admired the heroics of Captain Kirk and wanted to be able to be that cool calm leader?

You might still think the idea of a Brony is weird. Yet they are a pretty awesome bunch of people to hang out with and talk to. I especially enjoyed watching some of our military take on the question about what kind of army the world of My Little Pony would have (by far my favorite panel after the voice acting and Who's Line game). Still have doubts?

Watch the show.

I'm serious. I didn't get it either until I watched the first few episodes of the show. That's when it clicked. The show is good and sends a good message. Yes its geared toward preteen girls, but that doesn't mean it's unintelligent.



If you enjoyed this post or it really pissed you off, please like, share, or leave a comment. I love hearing from my readers. Until next week!